|
Winter 2004
Stemming the Nuclear Tide
page 1
| 2 |
3 | 4 |
There are also grounds for concern. The collapse of the Soviet
Union caused “instant proliferation.” Where there
had been one nuclear-weapons state, the Soviet Union, there were
suddenly four: Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine. Although
it is believed that all of those nuclear weapons have been consolidated
on Russian territory, there remains some doubt as to whether “all”
really means all, and as to whether there remain outside of Russia
substantial quantities of weapons-grade materials. Nor are we
confident that the weapons and materials within Russia are adequately
protected against theft or illicit purchase: The problem of “loose
nukes” continues to merit our attention. Finally, economic
dislocation in Russia has forced thousands of highly trained nuclear
scientists and engineers onto the job market, and they may find
willing employers among nations and organizations seeking to acquire
or produce nuclear weapons.
Non-state actors, such as al-Qaeda and some other
terrorist groups, have substantial resources, global reach and,
it appears, incentives to strike at Western interests on a massive
scale. It is unlikely that such a group could produce nuclear
weapons on its own. The greater danger is that it might get them
from a state sponsor, or it might buy or steal them. And there
is reason to believe that if a terrorist group like al-Qaeda got
nuclear weapons, it would use them.
All of these factors — incentives to acquire
and use nuclear weapons, ample financial resources, inadequately
secured nuclear weapons and materials, and a pool of highly trained
specialists willing to sell their expertise — contribute
to the challenge of stemming nuclear proliferation to states and
terrorist organizations. Yet it is a challenge that must be met
if our nation is to be secure. At present, U.S. nonproliferation
policy must focus on Russia (as a potential source of loose nukes),
North Korea, Iran and non-state groups, principally al-Qaeda.
Russia has thousands of nuclear weapons, thousands
of tons of weapons-grade materials and thousands of nuclear engineers
and scientists. Nightmarish stories of missing “suitcase
bombs,” unlocked or unguarded storage facilities, black
marketeering, etc. abound. Whether or not any of these tales is
true, it is in Russia’s interest, and ours, to redouble
efforts to secure those stockpiles and to prevent the leakage
of nuclear experts and expertise.
<previous>
<next>
|